On the morning of July 7, 2005, four young British Muslim men boarded the London Underground. They weren’t commuting to work. They weren’t on their way to school. According to their own beliefs, they were on a mission to paradise.
Within seconds, three coordinated bombs tore through the heart of the city’s transit system during the morning rush hour. A fourth exploded on a double-decker bus an hour later. Fifty-two innocent lives were lost. More than 700 people were injured. London, one of the world’s great capitals, was left reeling.
But what followed in the aftermath is arguably the more revealing story.
The attackers were not foreign infiltrators. They were British citizens—homegrown jihadists raised not in the mountains of Afghanistan, but in the neighborhoods of Leeds and Huddersfield. They grew up in the UK but were shaped by a different worldview: one rooted in the teachings of the Quran, the Hadith, and the example of Islam’s founder, Muhammad.
One of the bombers, Mohammed Sidique Khan, left behind a chilling video message explaining the motives behind the carnage. “Our religion is Islam,” he declared. “Obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final Prophet... Until we feel security, you will be our targets... We are at war, and I am a soldier.”
This was not a rogue ideology. It was a direct application of Quranic injunctions—such as Sura 9:29, which commands believers to "fight those who do not believe in Allah... until they feel themselves subdued."
So, how did Britain respond to this ideological threat?
Not with confrontation—but with conciliation. Not with a reckoning—but with retreat.
Rather than addressing the theological motivations behind the attack, Britain bent over backward to avoid offending the very ideology that inspired it. Critics of Islam were increasingly silenced under the banner of tolerance. Public discussion about jihad was treated as taboo. And in a strange historical irony, London later elected a mayor named Sadiq Khan—sharing a name with one of the July 7 bombers—who famously remarked that terrorism is “part and parcel of living in a big city.”
Today, London is a city transformed—not by bombs, but by policies. Mosques continue to rise. Blasphemy laws, unofficial but enforced, are increasingly used to police public speech. Citizens have been arrested for criticizing Islam, for quoting Islamic texts, even for preaching Christianity in public.
The message is clear: You may offend traditional British values, but offending Islamic sensibilities comes with consequences.
And yet, as society clamps down on Christian evangelists and upholds “diversity” as a sacred value, few stop to ask: What exactly are we tolerating—and at what cost?
It took four suicide bombers to shake Britain. It took no bombs at all to make it kneel.
Britain, and much of the West, has abandoned the moral foundations that once gave it strength. In the name of tolerance, it has tolerated intolerance. In the name of peace, it has surrendered to a doctrine that claims divine justification for war.
Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life.”
Muhammad said, “I have been commanded to fight the people until they say: ‘There is no god but Allah.’”
Only one of those messages builds civilization. The other, history shows, can tear it down.
July 7, 2005, was not just a tragedy—it was a warning.
July 7, 2025, marks twenty years of unanswered questions. And unless the West awakens—unless it turns back to the values that once made it great—it won’t need suicide bombers to collapse.
It will collapse from within.
No comments:
Post a Comment